Anybody here planning to implement CoAP and/or MQTT-SN on MicroPython ?
CoAP as requested before :
http://forum.micropython.org/viewtopic. ... 216&p=7389
Search found 352 matches
- Tue Nov 15, 2016 5:38 pm
- Forum: General Discussion and Questions
- Topic: Considering M2M communication protocols
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4305
- Tue Nov 15, 2016 2:07 pm
- Forum: ESP8266 boards
- Topic: MicroPython ESP8266 docs x WiPy docs
- Replies: 0
- Views: 5909
MicroPython ESP8266 docs x WiPy docs
I haven't seen this issue reported here. So I think it deserves somes attention. Part of the official MicroPython ESP8266 documentation still has content related to WiPy 1.0 : - 'uos' module cites '/flash' as the internal flash filesystem on ESP8266 where it should be '/'. New 'os.umount' function (...
- Sat Nov 12, 2016 5:40 pm
- Forum: General Discussion and Questions
- Topic: Free RAM on MicroPython boards
- Replies: 37
- Views: 76086
Re: Free RAM on MicroPython boards
Today's commit for ESP8266 increased the heap and this the available RAM by 8k. Thanks. Hope to see it in v1.8.6. Constrained RAM is one of the limitations of ESP8266, so this increase will be very useful. Tested today MicroPython v1.8.6-7 on ESP8266, after soft reset we have 29312 bytes (versus 20...
- Wed Nov 09, 2016 6:45 pm
- Forum: General Discussion and Questions
- Topic: Free RAM on MicroPython boards
- Replies: 37
- Views: 76086
Re: Free RAM on MicroPython boards
Today's commit for ESP8266 increased the heap and this the available RAM by 8k. Thanks. Hope to see it in v1.8.6. Constrained RAM is one of the limitations of ESP8266, so this increase will be very useful. 1st post updated with free RAM for LoPy and WiPy2, firmware v0.9.3.b2 with 77KB, 8KB more tha...
- Wed Nov 09, 2016 2:18 pm
- Forum: ESP32 boards
- Topic: LoPy specs and performance
- Replies: 3
- Views: 8935
Re: LoPy specs and performance
Measured specs (free RAM and free '/flash' space) for LoPy : * with firmware v0.9.2.b2 (28/10/2016) : free RAM 71152 bytes; 498 KB of free internal "/flash"; * with firmware v0.9.3.b2 (05/11/2016) : free RAM 79152 bytes; 498 KB of free internal "/flash"; * with firmware v0.9.4.b1 (14/11/2016) : free...
- Wed Nov 09, 2016 2:14 pm
- Forum: WiPy and CC3200 boards
- Topic: WiPy 2/ESP32 specs and performance
- Replies: 13
- Views: 22643
Re: WiPy 2/ESP32 specs and performance
With firmware v0.9.3.b2 (05/11/2016), the measured specs for WiPy 2.0 : free RAM 79152 bytes; 498 KB of free internal "/flash".
So the free RAM increased 8KB.
So the free RAM increased 8KB.
- Wed Nov 02, 2016 5:53 pm
- Forum: General Discussion and Questions
- Topic: Free RAM on MicroPython boards
- Replies: 37
- Views: 76086
Re: Free RAM on MicroPython boards
Added firmware/MicroPython versions for most of the boards in 1st post. I'll later update Pyboard line with the MicroPython version.
- Wed Nov 02, 2016 5:26 pm
- Forum: WiPy and CC3200 boards
- Topic: WiPy 2/ESP32 specs and performance
- Replies: 13
- Views: 22643
Re: WiPy 2/ESP32 specs and performance
WiPy 2.0 measured specs : * with firmware v0.9.2.b2 (28/10/2016) : free RAM 71152 bytes; 498 KB of free internal "/flash". Free RAM was measured with : import gc gc.collect() gc.mem_free() Is there any command to measure the free internal flash space ? I've measured by uplong files and summing up th...
- Sun Oct 30, 2016 1:44 pm
- Forum: WiPy and CC3200 boards
- Topic: NEW: WiPy 2.0 - shipping 10 Oct 2016
- Replies: 62
- Views: 79326
Re: NEW: WiPy 2.0 - shipping 10 Oct 2016
About LoPy and WiPy 2.0 : WEEKLY Update - Fred (2016-10-29) https://forum.pycom.io/topic/136/weekly-update-fred Dear All, It looks like another busy week on the forum with some great input by all members. It really is a pleasure to see the level of contribution ongoing. Yet I also share your frustra...
- Sun Oct 23, 2016 5:47 am
- Forum: General Discussion and Questions
- Topic: Free RAM on MicroPython boards
- Replies: 37
- Views: 76086
Re: Free RAM on MicroPython boards
Updated LoPy to 0.9.1.b1 firmware released today. Now free RAM is only 71152 bytes Also, every execution of gc.mem_free() is decresing it by 64 bytes :( Answer from here : 71,152 is the expected value for now. We will increase it in future releases, and we should end-up with something around 150K. ...