MicroPython Forum (Archive)

I created this "Test Discussion" to demonstrate.

https://github.com/micropython/micropyt ... sions/9154

The original source had a CR-LF between each line, but they are ignored in the standard format.

I had tried the "triple backtick" before posting my question. The problem I saw, was it merged all instructions on a single line with only a space in between. Then, when I added a CRLF it put an empty line between each instruction. Is that normal? For example after inserting CR-LF's: https://github....

Why is there an apparent migration of discussions away from the MicroPython.org site to GitHub. MicroPython.org has superior tools, particularly when is comes to inserting code snippets:

ESPNow code runs in ESP8266, throws an error in ESP32. Code: eNow = espnow.ESPNow() enRcvr = b'\x01\x02\x03\x04\x05\x06' devState = bytes('On', 'ascii') ackRcvd = eNow.send(enRcvr,devState,True) This code snippet runs without error in an ESP8266 In an ESP32 it throws this error: Traceback (most rece...

I generally go direct to the source when it comes to technical issues. When I initially looked up info on the generic I thought I downloaded the Reference Manual, it was the Data-Sheet that makes no reference to hibernation; the technical reference manual does. https://www.espressif.com/sites/defaul...

Given the lack of replies it appears that microPython does not support ESP32 hibernation-mode; however, I may have found the reason. A search of Espressif datasheets reveals that only the ESP32-S2, released in Sep 3, 2019, appears to support hibernation.

MM

I, for one, totally agree; a basic captcha would be totally sufficient; if needed at all.

ESP32 Power Modes: https://lastminuteengineers.com/esp32-s ... nsumption/
microPython clearly supports ESP deepsleep [e.g. machine.deepsleep()].

Does microPython support ESP32 hibernation? If so what is the code?

MM

It is solved, two sensors playing nicely with Node-Red.
I still don't understand why I needed to re-flash micropython to get it to work.
Yes, I do put Solved in the subject; when I remember.

No, it was just after the send; there was a little extra bookkeeping after that. Frankly, because the code was intended as a send-per-boot, I really didn't need to deactivate.