Search found 140 matches
- Sun Nov 04, 2018 5:14 pm
- Forum: Newsletter archive
- Topic: MicroPython Newsletter Issue 1
- Replies: 29
- Views: 362804
Re: MicroPython Newsletter Issue 1
I'm just posting in order to "subscribe" to notifications of any updates to this thread. I'd like very much to know the timeline and pricing of the next generation of PyBoard.
- Fri Nov 02, 2018 1:58 pm
- Forum: MicroPython pyboard
- Topic: What comes after v1.1, and when?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2524
Re: What comes after v1.1, and when?
That looks incredible. Thanks.
I wonder what it's going to cost. It really looks pretty remarkable, but that fact in itself is intimidating.
I wonder what it's going to cost. It really looks pretty remarkable, but that fact in itself is intimidating.
- Wed Oct 31, 2018 8:45 pm
- Forum: MicroPython pyboard
- Topic: What comes after v1.1, and when?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2524
What comes after v1.1, and when?
I'm curious if there is any project to develop the next generation of PyBoard? Is so, what features are being targeted? What is the time table for such a project, if any?
- Mon Oct 29, 2018 3:49 am
- Forum: MicroPython pyboard
- Topic: SCCB comms via I2C?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2650
Re: SCCB comms via I2C?
Guess I'll have to decide if I want to try it. The cameras cost nothing, so there's no harm in it, other than the risk of wasted time.
Thanks.
Thanks.
- Sun Oct 28, 2018 5:49 pm
- Forum: MicroPython pyboard
- Topic: Combining two bytes to one 16-bit object
- Replies: 5
- Views: 10041
Re: Combining two bytes to one 16-bit object
Aside from the response you already got, it's worth noting that it might be faster to manipulate bits and bytes with bit operators instead of arithmetic operators. So instead of adding the low byte trying ORing it instead: word = (high_byte << 8) | low_byte Of course, you would have to write a timer...
- Sun Oct 28, 2018 11:11 am
- Forum: MicroPython pyboard
- Topic: SCCB comms via I2C?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2650
SCCB comms via I2C?
There is some discussion about cameras going on in other threads. I noticed that some of the cameras available use an SCCB bus, which appears to be very similar to I2C. Has anyone actually used an SCCB device with a PyBoard yet?
- Sat Oct 27, 2018 1:13 pm
- Forum: MicroPython pyboard
- Topic: Camera integration
- Replies: 13
- Views: 17029
Re: Camera integration
Does the PyBoard's UART interface support the Adafruit's camera's baudrate (38400 to 115200)? The docs for MicroPython aren't very clear on which baudrates are permitted to the UART initialization routines (https://docs.micropython.org/en/latest/library/machine.UART.html). All the code examples show...
- Wed Jun 20, 2018 3:51 pm
- Forum: MicroPython pyboard
- Topic: USB virtual com RTS/CTS?
- Replies: 10
- Views: 7654
Re: USB virtual com RTS/CTS?
Thanks for these later responses. There are some good ideas here. I'm balancing the various pros and cons of all the ways to get this running smoothly. I'd hate to have to reinvent, at a high level, protocols that are generally presumed on offer by lower layers after decades of standardization and c...
- Tue Jun 19, 2018 7:25 pm
- Forum: General Discussion and Questions
- Topic: Memory allocation errors with plenty of space
- Replies: 16
- Views: 27254
Re: Memory allocation errors with plenty of space
Hmmm. Ok. On a PyBoard v1.1, running MP v1.9.4., I'm seeing the behavior described above. Thanks.
- Tue Jun 19, 2018 5:53 pm
- Forum: General Discussion and Questions
- Topic: Memory allocation errors with plenty of space
- Replies: 16
- Views: 27254
Re: Memory allocation errors with plenty of space
That memorview tool looks very useful. However, I am not seeing the expected behavior. Consider the following: mp.mem_info(1) a = bytearray(10000) mp.mem_info(1) b = a[:] mp.mem_info(1) c = memoryview(a) mp.mem_info(1) After allocating a , I see a large jump in used memory. After allocating b , I al...