MicroPython Forum (Archive)

There's indeed none, because the project is still in active development phase - it's just more productive to maintain just source than two of source and docs, both in flux. The easiest way to see if something is supported is to build a "unix" version and try it in the comfort of your "desktop" syste...

We now have 500 stars on Github: https://github.com/micropython/micropython/stargazers . That already surpasses some cool (and longer-living) projects. But we can do better, so if you or your friends still didn't star the project, please do .

Hi pfalcon, target 4Kb as the minimum RAM size (which amounts to ~2Kb heap) and 64Kb ROM are you sure about that figures? It would be much less compared to statements Damien gave on the kickstarter page. I'm only sure about what I'd like to achieve ;-). To make it clear: the 64K/2K figure is not wh...

Secondly, mircopython might grow over time and the minimum requirements might increase, thus it is not a bad idea to leave some space for future updates. Being stuck to an older version of micropython because the controller runs out of RAM or ROM is kind of disappointing. As my contribution to Micr...

Do we understand what are the practical minimum memory requirements to run Micropython? I would (eventually) target 4Kb as the minimum RAM size (which amounts to ~2Kb heap) and 64Kb as the minimum ROM size. This would be highly limited build (for example, only bytecode VM, no source parser), and su...