MicroPython Forum (Archive)

Small update,

currently able to run:
* communication over UART (debug interface)
* Set Pin and toggle output state
* Display (only pictures no video content)
* Temperature monitor

Next,
* USB

Hello, it's me
In needed in my project a function with four arguments. So I got the definition added to obj.h and objfunc.c.
maybe it needed someone else also.
Perhaps also an opportunity: to defined dynamically function for x arguments.
Just as a note.

My UART problems are solved. It works fine, now. Cute. If you'd select more wide-spread target, like Raspberry Pi, or just bare-metal x86, you might even catch some people testing or even contributing to it. Otherwise, well, keep us posted ;-). I have one raspberry that would be the next target afte...

Yes as bare-metal. On a Freescale Sabre board.
My tests so far: variable declarations and small calculations(10*5).

Something is not right with UART: it will not appear to me that I typed in but after I hit enter, it is displayed.

Hi,

after many attempts I’ve managed to port minimal to i.MX6 quadcore .
I get a repl via UART.
I report the next day about the progress.

Hello, can someone explain me how the makefile compile the python object files (https://github.com/micropython/micropython/blob/master/py/py.mk#L61), although the file extension is .c /.s? Is the solution in the file mkrules.mk https://github.com/micropython/micropython/blob/master/py/mkrules.mk#L1 ??

for sure

pfalcon is right!!
After many attempts, it makes no sense to use a reduced stmhal for porting. To much that needs to be adapted and many sources of errors.
minimal is the best way.

The thread can be deleted!!

Hello,

Is there a github repo?

Thanks in advance!

Thanks for the information,

I think the minimal its at my knowledge base not the right way to port micropython. It's to raw for me. I prefer to change existing code as write new.
I try it with my reduced version and when i don't make progress I try it with the minimal.