MicroPython Forum (Archive)

CC3200 Datasheet says:

Operating Temperature Range (C) : -40 to 85

I think it's always best to start with the stripped down version of SDK example and work from there. I doubt it'll compile straight away but don't just dump the whole thing in, start with a couple of new spi.c/h files, add it to targets in the Makefile and move functions across from the SDK example ...

@hugohase

You need to set the baudrate when invoking screen from your terminal, I'm not sure what it defaults to otherwise, I've been using picocom for a while now. For example:

That's great. Since I read your post Ray, I got pushover and registered. Going to wait for the smtplib to join the official library and going to give it a try! Care to share your example? :)

I would like to ask, is someone already working on fatfs support? If you had read my previous posts: I have started the port recently but had to postpone it due to my primary job plus the arrival of wipy! See this PR . Whenever I find time to do it, or someone else picks up, there will be more prog...

Hey Ferretproof! That's a neat idea, i never heard of pushover, gotta have a look into it! I think the problem is that the smtplib module is not implemented, I installed smtplib via upip for unix port and got the same results as you. But looking at micropython-lib/smtplib I can only see a dummy pack...

Either way, there's no filesystem for ESP yet. Sure, you can wrap spi_flash_write/read and spi_flash_erase_sector functions from spi_flash.h into some user functions and operate on blocks of flash, albeit in 4kb sectors only. Once the fatfs is implemented, there will be no hassle adding the SD card ...

- is it possible to boot from SD-card in SDIO mode and "mount" it to the file system? Do you have a module with SD card? I didn't know they exist yet. Short answer is no, you can't. Long answer is, once the fatfs is implemented for the ESP8266 port then you'd be able to use the os.mount function as...

Thanks for your help Dani, I'll look further into it.

Is there a thread where some of the esp8266 development communication is going on, or is it just random people making different changes? It's pretty much the latter. But people tend to open discussions here on a particular topic and update them as the development goes on. Otherwise, discussions hap...