Wouldn’t that be in datasheet?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Search found 629 matches
- Fri Apr 05, 2019 1:28 am
- Forum: Pyboard D-series
- Topic: RTC
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4953
- Tue Apr 02, 2019 5:22 pm
- Forum: ESP32 boards
- Topic: PC as an ESP32 simulator ?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 8479
Re: PC as an ESP32 simulator ?
If we had debugging on uPy this wouldn’t be necessary.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
- Tue Apr 02, 2019 12:30 am
- Forum: ESP8266 boards
- Topic: cannot disable unwanted modules
- Replies: 3
- Views: 2545
Re: cannot disable unwanted modules
If you want to do it via the makefile, the actual compilation command for a given .c file has to resolve to
-DSOME_MACRO=0
I don’t think your syntax resolves to the above format.
You could also change mpconfigport.h
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
-DSOME_MACRO=0
I don’t think your syntax resolves to the above format.
You could also change mpconfigport.h
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
- Sun Mar 31, 2019 9:03 pm
- Forum: Other Boards
- Topic: [TM4C123] how to disable debugging info in REPL
- Replies: 4
- Views: 3514
Re: [TM4C123] gc info disabled in gccollect.c but still displaying in repl?
What you disabled doesn’t even contain “n_pool”.
It’s in pyexec.c, 127
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
It’s in pyexec.c, 127
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
- Wed Mar 27, 2019 7:07 pm
- Forum: Programs, Libraries and Tools
- Topic: Launching a separate process instead of calling a memory intensive function
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6629
Re: Launching a separate process instead of calling a memory intensive function
Show us some pseudocode
- Tue Mar 26, 2019 8:18 pm
- Forum: Programs, Libraries and Tools
- Topic: Launching a separate process instead of calling a memory intensive function
- Replies: 11
- Views: 6629
- Mon Mar 25, 2019 4:49 pm
- Forum: General Discussion and Questions
- Topic: Could not import 'btree' in MicroPython 1.9.4
- Replies: 9
- Views: 5795
Re: Could not import 'btree' in MicroPython 1.9.4
Yes that’s correct.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
- Mon Mar 25, 2019 3:41 pm
- Forum: ESP8266 boards
- Topic: Debug firmware
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2087
- Sun Mar 24, 2019 9:15 pm
- Forum: General Discussion and Questions
- Topic: Target audience for MicroPython?
- Replies: 63
- Views: 83780
Re: Target audience for MicroPython?
I play in both C and Micro-python on micro controllers. I find MP strength is very fast development of code to a working finished product. I find C strength is very fast execution of code. You can choose to implement everything in python upfront to optimize speed of development and then selectively...
- Sun Mar 24, 2019 8:40 pm
- Forum: General Discussion and Questions
- Topic: Target audience for MicroPython?
- Replies: 63
- Views: 83780
Re: Target audience for MicroPython?
You don’t need to use C to write drivers (for the most part). Writing drivers mainly involves writing values to registers and Micropython has an interface to be able to access memory addresses directly. But it’s gonna be slower than writing it in C. Writing code in higher-level language is slower th...