Search found 215 matches
- Mon Oct 10, 2016 5:30 pm
- Forum: Programs, Libraries and Tools
- Topic: Pyserial3 and miniterm
- Replies: 6
- Views: 8537
Pyserial3 and miniterm
For those who are using pyserial's miniterm... it took me a while to figure this out: Since pyserial v3 the escape sequence are not processed by default. uPy makes heavy use of escape sequence so the repl is basically unusable - except you pass the -f direct parameter to the miniterm call. Thanks to...
- Wed Oct 05, 2016 7:04 pm
- Forum: ESP8266 boards
- Topic: Docker image
- Replies: 8
- Views: 8491
- Wed Oct 05, 2016 6:50 pm
- Forum: Development of MicroPython
- Topic: USB HID OUT endpoint implementation
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6641
Re: USB HID OUT endpoint implementation
I meant routing the HID IN/OUT endpoints as in-/output for the REPL (instead of using the VCP). It would replace the VCP functionality (there wouldn't be a COM port anymore). Pro: - no INF file necessary (only a problem on windows systems), so no driver mess/maintenace for these platforms Con: - No ...
- Wed Oct 05, 2016 4:42 am
- Forum: ESP8266 boards
- Topic: Docker image
- Replies: 8
- Views: 8491
Re: Docker image
I just saw that I haven't added the mpy-cross target... I 'll update this asap.
- Wed Oct 05, 2016 4:21 am
- Forum: Development of MicroPython
- Topic: USB HID OUT endpoint implementation
- Replies: 6
- Views: 6641
Re: USB HID OUT endpoint implementation
Did you manage to get a repl over HID?
just curious because it would enable complete driver-less OS support (no more inf files etc)
just curious because it would enable complete driver-less OS support (no more inf files etc)
- Wed Oct 05, 2016 3:36 am
- Forum: ESP8266 boards
- Topic: Docker image
- Replies: 8
- Views: 8491
Re: Docker image
I have also inluded this change and restructered things slightly. I missed to post an update, sorry: https://github.com/hoihu/projects/tree/master/docker/esp8266 there is a readme that explains things. Regarding flashing via RFC2217 (tcp-serial bridge). unfortunatly, using the huzzah boards this doe...
- Fri Sep 09, 2016 7:59 am
- Forum: Development of MicroPython
- Topic: low-level uC function vs. high level language expectations
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4318
Re: low-level uC function vs. high level language expectations
If we removed all of the interrupt callbacks and other "dangerous" things you might do, MicroPython would lose a large amount of its appeal (at least for me). for me too. regarding timing. I measured the delay until the python callback is executed to be around 15usec on a pyboard. That may be slow ...
- Fri Aug 26, 2016 8:41 am
- Forum: Other Boards
- Topic: Atmel SAM D21G18
- Replies: 13
- Views: 13878
Re: Atmel SAM D21G18
great to see that adafruit is increasing the support for micropython!
And personally i like that M0+ devices may be supported in the near future.
that is going to give a boost for uPy in the maker community.
And personally i like that M0+ devices may be supported in the near future.
that is going to give a boost for uPy in the maker community.
- Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:05 pm
- Forum: Other Boards
- Topic: Teensy 3.5/3.6
- Replies: 9
- Views: 10520
Teensy 3.5/3.6
that makes the teensy boards comparable to the pyboards I guess. 1Meg Flash 256kB RAM, cortex M4@180Mhz sounds familiar.
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/pa ... /508891821
it's got heaps of interfaces, even an ethernet stack. Probably will take quite an effort to port the hal.
https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/pa ... /508891821
it's got heaps of interfaces, even an ethernet stack. Probably will take quite an effort to port the hal.
- Thu Aug 11, 2016 7:34 pm
- Forum: Other Boards
- Topic: Porting to STM32L476Discovery/LimiFrog
- Replies: 44
- Views: 41499
Re: Porting to STM32L476Discovery/LimiFrog
from what I remember reading on crystal less operation was that it was using the SOF (start of frame) 1kHz timing on the USB bus to drive a FLL for the 48Mhz clock.