MicroPython Forum (Archive)

Would this also work with so-called non-pure modules, i.e. containing C code? I think the standard distutils can in such case invoke the compiler etc. This maybe requires that the core uPython functionality resides in a dynamic library so it can be reused by the external modules (and current REPL's ...

The fault on running scripts might be due to the unix/main.c expecting a path with forward slashes, can you check if that is the problem?

Checked with the InTime people and getting things working with another compiler seems doubtful - maybe ICC might work. However I kinda forgot MS did finally do quite some work towards C99 compatibility with the VS2013 release, and indeed: uPy compiles with a minimum of changes and about two thirds o...

I did briefly consider it a couple of years ago, but didn't look much further into it: IIRC the whole InTime SDK is only compatible with the MS toolsets. I'll check again too make sure though. But even if that works out I'm not sure if e.g. debugging in Visual Studio would work the same way as it do...

I'm looking for a Python distribution to run on Tenasys' INTime realtime system and by the looks of it uPy seems like it could work out: I mainly need interpreting, the basic builtins/math/collections etc. The rest I'd be providing myself (most of it ic C++) but it doesn't seem that hard to wrap it ...