Small update,
currently able to run:
* communication over UART (debug interface)
* Set Pin and toggle output state
* Display (only pictures no video content)
* Temperature monitor
Next,
* USB
Search found 53 matches
- Thu Jan 21, 2016 10:32 am
- Forum: Other Boards
- Topic: MicroPython on i.MX6
- Replies: 20
- Views: 16411
- Thu Dec 10, 2015 7:50 am
- Forum: Development of MicroPython
- Topic: MP_DEFINE_CONST_FUN_OBJ
- Replies: 1
- Views: 3134
MP_DEFINE_CONST_FUN_OBJ
Hello, it's me
In needed in my project a function with four arguments. So I got the definition added to obj.h and objfunc.c.
maybe it needed someone else also.
Perhaps also an opportunity: to defined dynamically function for x arguments.
Just as a note.
In needed in my project a function with four arguments. So I got the definition added to obj.h and objfunc.c.
maybe it needed someone else also.
Perhaps also an opportunity: to defined dynamically function for x arguments.
Just as a note.
- Mon Nov 23, 2015 3:51 pm
- Forum: Other Boards
- Topic: MicroPython on i.MX6
- Replies: 20
- Views: 16411
Re: MicroPython on i.MX6
My UART problems are solved. It works fine, now. Cute. If you'd select more wide-spread target, like Raspberry Pi, or just bare-metal x86, you might even catch some people testing or even contributing to it. Otherwise, well, keep us posted ;-). I have one raspberry that would be the next target afte...
- Thu Nov 19, 2015 11:01 am
- Forum: Other Boards
- Topic: MicroPython on i.MX6
- Replies: 20
- Views: 16411
Re: MicroPython on i.MX6
Yes as bare-metal. On a Freescale Sabre board.
My tests so far: variable declarations and small calculations(10*5).
Something is not right with UART: it will not appear to me that I typed in but after I hit enter, it is displayed.
My tests so far: variable declarations and small calculations(10*5).
Something is not right with UART: it will not appear to me that I typed in but after I hit enter, it is displayed.
- Wed Nov 18, 2015 2:36 pm
- Forum: Other Boards
- Topic: MicroPython on i.MX6
- Replies: 20
- Views: 16411
MicroPython on i.MX6
Hi,
after many attempts I’ve managed to port minimal to i.MX6 quadcore .
I get a repl via UART.
I report the next day about the progress.
after many attempts I’ve managed to port minimal to i.MX6 quadcore .
I get a repl via UART.
I report the next day about the progress.
- Tue Nov 10, 2015 10:13 am
- Forum: Development of MicroPython
- Topic: PY_O_BASENAME
- Replies: 4
- Views: 4274
PY_O_BASENAME
Hello, can someone explain me how the makefile compile the python object files (https://github.com/micropython/micropython/blob/master/py/py.mk#L61), although the file extension is .c /.s? Is the solution in the file mkrules.mk https://github.com/micropython/micropython/blob/master/py/mkrules.mk#L1 ??
- Tue Oct 20, 2015 7:10 am
- Forum: Development of MicroPython
- Topic: Reduced MicroPython
- Replies: 11
- Views: 9918
- Tue Oct 13, 2015 12:38 pm
- Forum: Development of MicroPython
- Topic: Reduced MicroPython
- Replies: 11
- Views: 9918
Re: Reduced MicroPython
pfalcon is right!!
After many attempts, it makes no sense to use a reduced stmhal for porting. To much that needs to be adapted and many sources of errors.
minimal is the best way.
The thread can be deleted!!
After many attempts, it makes no sense to use a reduced stmhal for porting. To much that needs to be adapted and many sources of errors.
minimal is the best way.
The thread can be deleted!!
- Wed Sep 09, 2015 8:56 am
- Forum: Other Boards
- Topic: Porting to STM32F429, where to increase code size?
- Replies: 56
- Views: 72060
Re: Porting to STM32F429, where to increase code size?
Hello,
Is there a github repo?
Thanks in advance!
Is there a github repo?
Thanks in advance!
- Fri Sep 04, 2015 9:34 am
- Forum: Development of MicroPython
- Topic: Reduced MicroPython
- Replies: 11
- Views: 9918
Re: Reduced MicroPython
Thanks for the information,
I think the minimal its at my knowledge base not the right way to port micropython. It's to raw for me. I prefer to change existing code as write new.
I try it with my reduced version and when i don't make progress I try it with the minimal.
I think the minimal its at my knowledge base not the right way to port micropython. It's to raw for me. I prefer to change existing code as write new.
I try it with my reduced version and when i don't make progress I try it with the minimal.