Page 2 of 2
Re: Benchmark comparison of MicroPython boards
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2019 10:07 am
by ckuehnel
PyStone result for MAiX BiT w/ MicroPython v0.1.1 (CPU clock 403 MHz):
>>> os.uname()
(sysname='MaixPy', nodename='MaixPy', release='0.1.1', version='v0.1.1 on 2019-02-20', machine='Sipeed_M1 with kendryte-k210')
>>> exec(open('pystone_lowmem.py').read())
Pystone(1.2) time for 500 passes = 98 ms
This machine benchmarks at 5102 pystones/second
Re: Benchmark comparison of MicroPython boards
Posted: Mon Mar 11, 2019 7:05 pm
by rcolistete
Thanks, so I've updated the 1st post with benchmarks on Pyboard D, ESP32 and MAiX BiT.
Re: Benchmark comparison of MicroPython boards
Posted: Thu Jul 30, 2020 12:57 pm
by scruss
I don't think there's one in the table for the ATSAMD51, so I ran these on the Seeed Wio Terminal:
Code: Select all
Seeed Wio Terminal (120 MHz ATSAMD51P19A, MicroPython 331f7c9-dirty on 2020-06-30; Ardupy with seeed)
pystone_lowmem:
Pystone(1.2) time for 500 passes = 339 ms
This machine benchmarks at 1474 pystones/second
('from utime import ...' changed to 'from time import ...' for compatibility with Ardupy)
performanceTest:
>>> performanceTest()
Count: 2192872
hsquare:
>>> Doing 50000 calculations...
calculations done after 7372 ms.
Mean time for each inverse h square calculation = 147.4400043487549 us
The Wio Terminal claims to support a 200 MHz mode, but Ardupy doesn't seem to expose any frequency control through standard libraries.
CircuitPython is much faster. It may be running at 200 MHz:
Code: Select all
Adafruit CircuitPython 6.0.0-alpha.2 on 2020-07-23; Seeeduino Wio Terminal with9
pystone_lowmem:
Pystone(1.2) time for 500 passes = 352 ms
This machine benchmarks at 1420 pystones/second
performanceTest:
Count: 582628
hsquare:
Doing 50000 calculations...
calculations done after 3200 ms.
Mean time for each inverse h square calculation = 64.0000009536743 us
Sum of inverse h square = 37885.3893280029297
Mean of inverse h square = 0.7577078342438
Re: Benchmark comparison of MicroPython boards
Posted: Tue Oct 20, 2020 6:11 pm
by manitou
Micropython/circuitpython benchmarks on teensy 4 and others
https://forum.pjrc.com/threads/59040-Ci ... post226210
Re: Benchmark comparison of MicroPython boards
Posted: Thu Feb 04, 2021 3:12 pm
by ckuehnel
Raspberry Pi Pico:
MPY: soft reboot
MicroPython v1.13-290-g556ae7914 on 2021-01-21; Raspberry Pi Pico with RP2040
Type "help()" for more information.
>>> uos.uname()
(sysname='rp2', nodename='rp2', release='1.13.0', version='v1.13-290-g556ae7914 on 2021-01-21 (GNU 10.2.0 MinSizeRel)', machine='Raspberry Pi Pico with RP2040')
>>> exec(open('Pi_Pico_Pystone_lowmem.py').read())
Pystone(1.2) time for 500 passes = 460ms
This machine benchmarks at 1086 pystones/second
>>>
Re: Benchmark comparison of MicroPython boards
Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2021 1:23 pm
by aziubin
STMicroelectronics NUCLEO-L476RG board:
MPY: sync filesystems
MPY: soft reboot
MicroPython v1.14-82-gcdaec0dca-dirty on 2021-02-27; NUCLEO-L476RG with STM32L476RG
Type "help()" for more information.
>>> import pyb
>>> print(pyb.freq())
(80000000, 80000000, 80000000, 80000000)
>>> import os
>>> print(os.uname())
(sysname='pyboard', nodename='pyboard', release='1.14.0', version='v1.14-82-gcdaec0dca-dirty on 2021-02-27', machine='NUCLEO-L476RG with STM32L476RG')
>>> %Run -c $EDITOR_CONTENT
Pystone(1.2) time for 500 passes = 648ms
This machine benchmarks at 771 pystones/second
>>>
Re: Benchmark comparison of MicroPython boards
Posted: Wed May 12, 2021 1:18 am
by scruss
MCUDev DevEBox STM32H7XX_M
STM32H743VIT6 at 400 MHz
built with mcauser's
MCUDev DevEBox STM32H7XX_M, with this patch applied from the open issues list:
mpconfigboard.h - and don't forget to
make submodules!
This board is arse-kickingly fast:
Code: Select all
MicroPython v1.15-99-g87e38b3cc on 2021-05-11; MCUDEV DEVEBOX STM32H7XX_M with STM32H7XX
Type "help()" for more information.
>>> machine.freq()
(400000000, 200000000, 100000000, 100000000)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pystone(1.2) time for 500 passes = 79 ms
This machine benchmarks at 6329 pystones/second
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
performanceTest.py:
Count: 10575191 (pyb...)
Count: 10807924 (time.ticks_ms)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hsquare_ms.py:
Doing 50000 calculations...
calculations done after 1124 ms.
Mean time for each inverse h square calculation = 22.4799990653992 us
Sum of inverse h square = 38023.2257843017578
Mean of inverse h square = 0.7604645729065
Re: Benchmark comparison of MicroPython boards
Posted: Wed May 19, 2021 8:44 am
by Jackli
Thanks for sharing.
Re: Benchmark comparison of MicroPython boards
Posted: Fri Mar 01, 2024 2:24 pm
by ckuehnel
Raspberry Pi Pico W w7 RP2040 @ 125 MHz
Pystone (1.2) time for 500 passes = 384 ms
This machine benchmarks at 1302 pystones/second.