Re: why is there no mp_obj type for small int?
Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2018 2:31 am
stijn wrote:Well, yes, but like Dave says: just like functions wanting a qstr take a qstr and not a pointer-sized type, functions wanting an int use mp_int_t. Or maybe I'm missing the point.
mp_int_t is not an MP OBJ.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk